為幫助大家準(zhǔn)備gre考試內(nèi)容，小編在此分享GRE作文機(jī)考經(jīng)驗。希望對大家有所幫助!

GRE作文機(jī)考經(jīng)驗分享

我的GRE作文已經(jīng)考完了，由于很努力地準(zhǔn)備，導(dǎo)致考場上RP爆發(fā)，Issue抽到超高頻，Argu是考試前最后一次模擬考試寫過的，所以考場上就是直接默寫?，F(xiàn)在我把我以前在看帖子過程中收集到的考場上的兩個有用的小技巧貢獻(xiàn)給大家，請還沒考得同學(xué)注意了。

第一個是補(bǔ)習(xí)老師在他的課堂上透露的得小技巧，就是寫作文的界面上幾個按鈕中唯獨缺少“copy”功能，可以通過按兩次“cut”,然后再點 “paste”來替代。在考場中這一招很有用，特別是Argu中，把前面打的觀點，專有名詞直接粘貼，能節(jié)約3、4分鐘寶貴時間。

另外一個是我在太傻論壇一張不起眼的帖子上看到的。機(jī)考Issue前有一個適應(yīng)性練習(xí)，規(guī)定不能超過30分鐘，讓考生熟悉軟件的用法并且填一張調(diào)查問卷。其中有一個部分是熟悉鍵盤的使用，但是我就按照前輩的做法，利用這個機(jī)會，先在鍵盤上狂敲了一遍Issue和argu的模板，然后把平常用但容易打錯的單詞敲了幾遍。

大家可不要小看這個細(xì)節(jié)，它能讓你迅速回憶起模板，進(jìn)入狀態(tài)。否則有的人本來就緊張，結(jié)果開始寫Issue時手就哆嗦。不過要注意控制好時間，前面部分不能超過規(guī)定的30分鐘。我當(dāng)時就興奮過了頭，幸好善良的監(jiān)考官從攝像頭里看見過了二十多分鐘我還在練打字，趕緊跑過來叫我做后面的調(diào)查問卷。

GRE作文機(jī)考注意事項

GRE作文考試的流程

考生首先應(yīng)熟悉GRE作文考試的流程，一般情況下，考生從到達(dá)考場到考試完畢，通常分為以下六步：

第一、考生查考號，領(lǐng)取柜子鑰匙和夾著紙的硬板，紙上是所要抄的誓言。聽完監(jiān)考老師講完注意事項后，就開始抄誓言，寫地址條(考生收信地址，英文格式和郵政編碼)。

第二、把隨身攜帶的所有東西(除了兩個證件之外)都存入柜子里。任何食品、飲料、滴眼液等與考試無關(guān)的物品都不允許帶入考場。注意：考試過程中是不允許脫衣服的，所以考生要視環(huán)境冷熱而行。

第三、監(jiān)考老師開始檢查考生的證件，發(fā)草稿紙(六張)。

第四、老師按號要求考生照相(對著攝像頭)，核對姓名和地址之類的。然后考生進(jìn)考場，耳塞都掛在電腦桌的隔板上，兩支鉛筆放在桌上。

第五、開始考試后，首先熟悉鍵盤和鼠標(biāo)和填寫背景調(diào)查(這兩個步驟都可以跳過)，填寫兩個筆考考場。然后寫ISSUE和ARGUMENT。最后填寫送分學(xué)校。

第六、到了考場門口把草稿紙還給老師。

注：各個考場可能細(xì)節(jié)上不太一樣，考生們應(yīng)視具體情況而定。另外，考生還應(yīng)注意幾個問題。

注意問題一：必須帶好的證件

準(zhǔn)考證號是注冊時候發(fā)到郵箱里面的那封郵件上面的號碼，郵件不用打印出來，只要考試時記著號碼就可以。

參加GRE/GMAT考試的考生要攜帶兩類有效證件，其中至少有一個是第一類證件。第一類證件至少有一種是護(hù)照、正式居民身份證或軍官證.第二類證件可以是駕駛證、帶鋼印的工作證(不接受工作卡) 、往來港澳通行證、外國人居留證、港澳居民回鄉(xiāng)證或由正規(guī)大專院校頒發(fā)的學(xué)生證(不含五大：電視大學(xué)、夜大學(xué)、職業(yè)大學(xué)、業(yè)余大學(xué)、函授大學(xué);其他任何培訓(xùn)性質(zhì)的院?；蚺嘤?xùn)項目頒發(fā)任何形式的證書均不接受)。

缺少第二類證件，可到考生本人所在學(xué)校學(xué)生處、單位人事部門、戶籍所在地派出所、檔案所在人才交流中心、街道辦事處開具身份證明信(戶籍所在地派出所開具的證明信應(yīng)該是有照片、蓋有戶籍章的格式打印戶籍證明。其他證明信需有本人照片、本人簽字、本人身份證號碼，個人體貌特征描述和經(jīng)辦單位人事部門電話，經(jīng)辦人簽字，并且在照片上蓋有介紹單位的公章)。

按照ETS要求，考場不接受以下證件作為考試證件：(但不僅限于此)：臨時證件(包括臨時身份證、臨時駕駛執(zhí)照、臨時工作證等)，過期的證件(包括過期身份證、過期駕駛執(zhí)照、過期工作證等)，國際駕駛執(zhí)照，社會保險卡 ，任何信用卡 ，公證函 ，工作卡 ，出入證(卡)。

未按要求出示證件的考生，考場有權(quán)拒絕其參加考試。持任何假證件的考生不能參加考試。證件方面如果出現(xiàn)問題(例如身份證遺失)或者出現(xiàn)自己無法確定的情況，請千萬提前打電話到考試中心詢問清楚相關(guān)事宜。

另注意，如果發(fā)生證件不全情況，考試中心會要求考生盡快拿回證件，但是一天只有2場考試，如果在最后一場考試開始后還沒有帶來，就不能再考試了。最后一場在上午11點到場。

提醒：請各位務(wù)必自行確認(rèn)有效證件，避免出現(xiàn)_放棄考試甚至全盤計劃被打亂，事后再后悔不迭的情況出現(xiàn)!

注意問題二：草稿紙的問題

進(jìn)入考場之后，工作人員會發(fā)給每一個考生兩支鉛筆，六張草稿紙。進(jìn)去之前一定要數(shù)一下確認(rèn)。六張草稿紙是釘在一起的，不要弄散，出來的時候要還回去，一張也不能少，發(fā)現(xiàn)少了會很麻煩。如果考場上不發(fā)草稿紙，可以給考點要索取。

注意不要在做問卷的時候?qū)懩０濉：芏嗫忌谧鲎魑那暗膯柧碚{(diào)查時就在草稿紙上寫模板了，這是不允許的，會被視作作弊?？忌梢赃m當(dāng)?shù)膶懸恍┨峋V，這樣會在寫作時有清晰的思路。

注意問題三：時間的分配

整個考試總共120分鐘。在最前面在電腦上填寫一些個人信息之類的，以及讓你熟悉界面，是45分鐘。 ISSUE 45分鐘，ARGUEMNT 30分鐘，這樣就是120分鐘。 ISSUE和ARGUMENT兩個部分之間沒有休息時間。

如果之前已經(jīng)用PP3模擬考過的，最前面那45分鐘的很多內(nèi)容都可以跳過去。但是跳過去的部分節(jié)省的時間不能算到作文里。一旦選擇結(jié)束這個調(diào)查和熟悉界面的部分，考試立即開始.，即看到作文題時記時已經(jīng)開始。所以審題和列提綱的時間都是在45/30分鐘內(nèi)。

另外，左下角有個倒記時的小鐘，前40分鐘可以點擊它，使左上角的數(shù)字倒計時消失。但最后5分鐘無論你愿意不愿意，左上角的倒計時都會出現(xiàn)。

注意問題四：考試時的界面是TXT

TXT只有復(fù)制剪切粘貼的功能，沒有WORD的糾錯功能。雖然平時?？嫉膒p3在windows下執(zhí)行的時候右鍵仍然可以用(因為是文本框)，真正考試的時候鼠標(biāo)的左右鍵是完全一樣的，所以提醒慣用鼠標(biāo)右鍵進(jìn)行cut或者paste等操作的考生，平時準(zhǔn)備的時候要注意到這一點，實際考試時沒有這種快捷鍵。

注意問題五：免費寄成績的學(xué)校的填寫

考試前要想好確定自己要填哪幾所學(xué)校，哪個專業(yè)。學(xué)校的選擇是按國家、州、學(xué)校、專業(yè)來選的，所以考生只要知道學(xué)校的全稱和學(xué)校在哪個州。BULLETIN上也有學(xué)校代碼。雖然給出的選擇的州名不是全稱，但也不是兩個子母的縮寫，每個人只要知道州名的全稱都可以分辨出來那種形式州名的縮寫。如果實在不確定，可以向監(jiān)考老師詢問。建議考生選與自己水平適合的中等大學(xué)，太好的先別選。

注意問題六：表和耳機(jī)

關(guān)于用來計時的表，如果你想帶進(jìn)考場，一定要戴指針的，手機(jī)或其它電子計時器是不被允許的。

關(guān)于耳機(jī)，各個考點所提供的耳機(jī)是不同的。建議大家開始就戴上耳機(jī)，因為周圍嘈雜的鍵盤聲和因錯誤操作而產(chǎn)生的不絕于耳的“滴滴”聲可能會影響考生的情緒。

注意問題七：考完之后

筆考準(zhǔn)考證(AdmissionTicket)從美國ETS本部寄出，目前沒有明確的數(shù)據(jù)表明在作文考試幾天之后一定可以拿到準(zhǔn)考證。如果在筆考日期之前的2到3個禮拜仍沒有拿到準(zhǔn)考證，請立刻與ETS本部聯(lián)系。Email地址為：gre-info@ets.org。

能否取得高分，不僅取決于你準(zhǔn)備的充分與否，而且在于你發(fā)揮的如何。如果你已經(jīng)準(zhǔn)備的很完備，適當(dāng)?shù)淖⒁庖幌驴赡軙龅降膯栴}，熟悉一下考試的過程，參考一下經(jīng)驗，你就會更加得心應(yīng)手。

GRE寫作滿分范文1

ing?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??

"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??

The?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?should?lose?his?job.??It?is?clear?that?his?analysis?of?the?decrease?in?attendance?in?the?past?year?was?incomplete.??A?better?qualified?individual?might?have?explored?the?issue?further?by?doing?several?different?things.??First?of?all,?surveys?of?the?general?population?could?provide?a?clue?to?the?decreased?viewership.?They?may?find?that?people?aren't?as?willing?to?pay?the?high?prices?anymore.??A?survey?may?also?reveal?that?people?are?aware?of?Silver?Screen,?but?opt?not?to?see?the?films.??An?inspection?of?the?nature?of?the?films?made?by?Silver?Screen?could?also?hint?to?the?root?of?the?problem.??If?Silver?Screen?produces?a?lot?of?the?same?type?of?movie,?then?the?problem?may?be?that?they?don't?produce?enough?to?appeal?to?the?diverse?interests?of?the?population.??For?instance,??if?their?movies?typically?contain?excessive?violence?and?foul?language,?parents?won't?take?their?children?to?these?films.??That?is?a?significant?portion?of?the?potential?viewing?population?lost.??

The?ad?director?mentions?that?reviewers?liked?specific?films?and?gave?more??favorable?reviews?than?in?the?past.??But?he?neglects?to?mention?the?specific?numbers-?critics?may?have?raved?about?2?movies?and?turned?their?thumbs?down?the?10?others.??If?thats'?the?case,?it's?no?wonder?that?viewership?has?declined.??

Spending?more?on?advertising,?and?less?on?production,?as?the?ad?director?suggests,?could?drive?the?company?out?of?business.??If?the?media?builds?alot?of?hype?over?a?new?release?that?was?poorly?produced,?people?are?more?likely?to?be?disappointed,?and?skeptical?about?future?productions.??This?is?certainly?not?in?the?company's?best?interests.?What?is?in?the?company's?best?interest?is?a?broader?scope?of?the?problem,?and?different?approaches?to?solving?i??

Commentary??

This?strong?response?begins?with?an?attack?on?the?advertising?director?of?Silver?Screen?but?quickly?shifts?to?identifying?major?flaws?in?the?argument.??The?main?points?of?the?critique?are?that??

--?the?real?reasons?for?a?decline?in?viewership?have?not?yet?been????identified;?

--?Silver?Screen?may?not?produce?different?kinds?of?movies?to?appeal?to????diverse?interests;?

--?the?number?of?favorably?reviewed?movies?may?actually?have?been????very?low;?and?

--?spending?money?to?produce?a?possibly?poor?movie?could?hurt?rather than?help?the?company.??

Although?more?points?are?made?here?than?are?made?in?the?sample?6?response?on?this?topic,?each?of?the?points?made?in?the?6?paper?is?developed.??That?is?not?the?case?here.??In?this?response,?each?point?is?supported?(by?perhaps?an?additional?sentence),?but?it?is?not?further?developed.??The?paper?is?smoothly?organized?with?few?but?appropriate?transitions.??The?writing?is?strong?with?some?variety?in?syntax.??For?these?reasons,?this?response?earns?a?score?of?5.?

GRE寫作滿分范文2

The?following?is?taken?from?a?memo?from?the?advertising?director?of?the?Silver?Screen?Movie?Production?Company.??

"According?to?a?recent?report?from?our?marketing?department,?fewer?people?attended?movies?produced?by?Silver?Screen?during?the?past?year?than?in?any?other?year.??And?yet?the?percentage?of?generally?favorable?comments?by?movie?reviewers?about?specific?Silver?Screen?movies?actually?increased?during?this?period.??Clearly,?the?contents?of?these?reviews?are?not?reaching?enough?of?our?prospective?viewers;?so?the?problem?lies?not?with?the?quality?of?our?movies?but?with?the?public's?lack?of?awareness?that?movies?of?good?quality?are?available.??Silver?Screen?should?therefore?spend?more?of?its?budget?next?year?on?reaching?the?public?through?advertising?and?less?on?producing?new?movies."??

Although?the?reasoning?in?this?arguement?is?logical,?the?writer?failed?to?consider?other?reasons?for?the?disparity?between?the?percentage?of?people?attending?the?company's?movie?and?the?percentage?of?favorable?reviews.??Perhaps?the?fault?lies?with?the?reviewers?and?not?the?production?company;?the?public?may?not?trust?the?critics'?reviews.??Another?posibility?for?the?attendance?drop?is?that?the?general?public?does?not?find?the?subject?matter?of?the?movies?enticing.??If?that?were?the?case,?spending?less?on?producing?new?movies?in?an?effort?to?re-direct?funds?to?advertising?could?backfire?by?further?limiting?the?types?of?movies?available?to?the?potential?audience.??Maybe?the?general?public?is?simply?not?impressed?with?the?critically-acclaimed?qualities?of?the?movies?(such?as?eloquent?screenplays,?artful?cinematography,?and?realistic?acting)?and?and?would?prefer?seeing?flashy?special?effects?and?big-name?stars.??The?possible?reasons?for?the?attendance?decline?are?numerous;?even?aspects?not?directly?related?to?the?movie?industry?(such?as?the?improving?quality?of?television?programming?and?the?increasing?popularity?of?home?computer?use)?may?play?large?roles.??The?company's?management?would?be?wise?to?consider?and?study?the?entire?realm?of?possibilities?before?making?drastic?changes?in?its?budget?based?on?one?statistical?discovery.??

Commentary??

This?response?identifies?and?analyzes?some?important?flaws?in?the?argument.??Although?the?number?of?points?mentioned?is?the?same?as?that?in?the?sample?5?paper,?this?response?remains?at?the?4?score?level?because?the?points?of?the?critique?are?only?minimally?developed?or?supported.??

The?essay?identifies?four?points:??

--?the?public?might?not?trust?critics?

--?the?movies'?subject?matter?might?not?be?appealing

--?the?public?might?prefer?seeing?special?effects?or?big-name?stars?rather????than?good?cinematography?or?realistic?acting?

--?perhaps?improvement?in?TV?programming?or?increased?use?of?home????computers?has?kept?people?away?from?movie?theaters??

Ideas?in?the?response?are?conveyed?well?and?clearly;?the?use?of?language?is?generally?strong.??But?the?paper's?"bare-bones"?analysis?gives?it?a?list-like?quality.??It?is?therefore?merely?adequate?and?merits?a?score?of?4.?

GRE作文機(jī)考經(jīng)驗分享相關(guān)文章：